ACE

Audit Clinical Evidence

Independent audits of published clinical research for statistical errors, data inconsistencies, and research integrity violations.

Audit Clinical Evidence (ACE) exists to protect the credibility of the scientific record. We audit published clinical research for errors and signs of falsification, fabrication, manipulation, and misconduct. If it slipped past peer review, we find it. We document it. We publish it. We report it.

A catalog of published ACE audit reports

ACE2026001

Audit of Abdelbasset et al. (2019)

Three randomized controlled trials on exercise and depression

Heart Disease Exercise Depression RCT
Abstract
This report audits three randomized controlled trials by Abdelbasset and colleagues evaluating exercise interventions for depression in patients with congestive heart failure. The three articles appear to report overlapping arms from the same underlying clinical trial while presenting them as separate studies. Across the articles, duplicated baseline characteristics and PHQ-9 outcome statistics indicate reuse of the same trial data even though the articles report incompatible authorship contribution statements and three distinct ethical approval numbers, and do not cite one another. The articles are potentially linked to a well-documented authorship-for-sale publication network. Furthermore, one of the three articles identifies Abdelbasset as both first author and editor which is a clear conflict of interest. Reported summary statistics are impossible given a real data set, specifically, seven of nine PHQ-9 (the primary outcome) mean and standard deviation pairs fail GRIMMER consistency tests. The reported outcomes also imply extreme between-group standardized mean differences of approximately three standard deviations at post-intervention, making the studies highly influential outliers in later meta-analyses. In total, this audit identifies 21 instances of Research Integrity Violations across seven categories. We conclude that the three articles are not credible and are unlikely to contain any evidentiary value thus we recommend retraction by the publishing journals.
PublishedSep 13, 2026
UpdatedSep 13, 2026
Read online PDF
Infected 74articles 17reviews 22guidelines
No matching items